On the near south-side (wards 8 and 6) lines run outside polling places and around the corner. Those hoping to zip in early (like me) were astounded to see a very motivated crowd of a hundred, merry and spirited, most with coffee.
If this scene is being played out in other parts of the city and St. Louis County and continues through the day, it should lift any close state-wide races in the direction of the Democrats.
Steve Eagleton who lost to James Trout last night in the Democratic primary for the 15th District is asking for a recount. According to the Secretary of State website, Eagleton received 5,130 votes to Trout's 5,165.
Here's the statement: The hotly contested 15th State Senate Democratic Primary came down to the wire last night.The unofficial results have Steve Eagleton trailing his opponent by 35 votes out of over 10,000.The Eagleton campaign will file for a recount immediately to insure that every vote is counted correctly."I owe this district, my supporters, and the Democratic Party the peace of mind that every vote was counted correctly," said Eagleton from his campaign headquarters Wednesday.
Are there any other unreported votes out there that can giver her the edge? Or will Koster finish it with a squeaker in the hard-fought, three-way AG race?
Update: The SOS shows a .1% separation between Koster and Donnelly. It's 34.6% to 34.5% with 3456 of 3515 precincts in.
Rep. Jeff Harris is not producing the votes he might–and some of us political watchers–have been expecting.
Donnelly, however, was always the one to watch. She had neither Koster's money nor Harris' visibility, but she has a serious record and dedicated supporters.
According to his latest 24-hour notices filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission, Rep. Rodney Hubbard's campaign received $18,825 from Sinqufeld-affiliated groups.
Hubbard also received $1,000 from the 65th District Legislative Committee, which hasn't posted it's own 24-hour notice yet, and $2,200 from five individual donors.
That's a total of $22,025 to take care of the last-minute expenses.
Went to my 8th ward about a half hours ago, only voter in or out at the time. One ward member handing out the green ballot. Signs for April Harris, Margaret Donnelly, Jeff Harris, Jeanette Mott Oxford (unopposed), Larry Williams and Co, and the MSD bond issue.
Updated: Obama takes the regional cores, but they split the surrounding counties
In Western Missouri, Clinton and Obama split the Kansas City region with Obama taking the city 66% to 33% and Clinton took Jackson County 54% to 43%.
In Eastern Missouri, the City of St. Louis and St. Louis County Sen. Barack Obama is ahead. He has a 69% to 29% lead in St. Louis City (84% reporting) and a 61% to 37% lead in St. Louis County.
This post has been updated to correct some of the information.
With 61% of precincts counted, Prop S is ahead 55% to 45%.
Sales tax initiatives are often difficult, but "public safety" initiatives are hard to argue against. Especially tax increases endorsed by the local business paper.
It's awfully early, but boy there may be a shocker. I've written about this for my MOScout subscribers. Here's the story.
There are three special elections tonight for vacated state representative seats. One is a clear Democratic seat - 65-RD, Fred Kratky resigned, being replaced by his wife. She's unopposed.
Two are clear Republican seats: 16-RD in St. Charles. Carl Bearden resigned to pursue a lobbying career. And 158-RD in the bootheel where Nathan Cooper is in jail for crimes relating to immigration fraud.
16-RD is a 54-ish RPI (Republican Performance Index) and 158-RD is 60 RPI, maybe even more. No problem, right? Wrong.
The Democrats are more energized by their presidential candidates. In the primary states previous to Super Tuesday, Democratic turn-out for voting has eclipsed Republican turn-out. And the strong Dem turn-out may also be the result of independents voting Democratic.
So the theory goes, more Democratic voters turning out confronted with two largely unknown names (because these are special elections, no incumbent is running) and they'll vote the party they just chose for president.
In 158-RD there are actually a few more factors helping. Republicans put up a 79 year old former state representative who hasn't done any work, while the Democratic challenger, Mike Keefe, has knocked on 5,000 doors. There's still the stench of scandal from Cooper. And Keefe won the Missouri Right to Life endorsement.
Currently I am staking out the watch party at the Royale on South Kingshighway.
A few conversations with some of the Democratic organizers who have been out at polling places around the city hints at a better than record turnout.
"Better than record turnout?"
It's all anecdotal, but they are passing along information that in some historically low-turnout wards in the city the numbers are up, by a large measure. Regular votes who see 40, maybe 50 voters by the time they usually vote are seeing numbers that are triple that.
Take it with a grain of salt, but if you enjoy politics, it's a welcome sign.
From reader comments earlier in the day it sounds like the morning shift was fairly busy, leading into the afternoon.
Has the rain slowed things down, or has it not dampened folks spirit?
Also, there have been a few notes of members of the recall group gathering signatures at polling places. Have they been busy, or are they few and far between?
The open thread on the sales tax issue seems to have stirred up a good discussion.
The nature of an issue like the sales tax is that a lot of hands are involved in passing it through to the voters, but in essence there are only two places in City Hall that count.
The bill, Board Bill 362, was introduced by Ald. Conway, ward 8, and Board President Reed. It was approved by the public safety committee. Upon returning to the main body, the bill passed unanimously (pdf). The only "aye" lacking on the final vote (pdf) was Ald. Bosley, Jr. who was absent. The Mayor then signed the bill.
The proposal has been endorsed by the Mayor who is looking for a way to fund the pension system whose problems proceed the Slay and a number of the current board members. The Mayor highlights an endorsement of Prop S by the St. Louis Business Journal on his website.
The Comptroller has also endorsed the idea of a sales tax, but in a press release on her website she says the version before the voters is not what she would have approved. She has also been a regular critic of the tax-abatement strategies used to lure new business (or entice existing businesses) to the city that seem to fall like confetti around the city.
Is the sales tax the best method to address the shortfall? Perhaps. While the city residents obviously bear the brunt of the tax, it also takes advantage of the volume of people living outside the city who commute into the city for work or entertainment. The backlash against property taxes is in full swing, and there may be similar resistance to a bond issue.
That said, sales taxes are inherently regressive and hit the poor disproportionally hard. Even for the 50-odd percent of city households making more than $25k a year, every little bit counts when inflation surpases economic growth.
The lawsuit was the city's last hope to fend off the impending fiscal calamity. Now it's up to the voters to decide if they want to accept the solution proposed by the Mayor and the Board of Aldermen.
The sales tax supported by Mayor Francis Slay and approved by the Board of Aldermen, Proposition S, is up for approval or rejection today.
The $18 million in estimated revenue would go to pay increases for
police and firemen, to hire more officers and-constituting the bulk of
the revenue, $11 million-pay towards the city's escalating pension
obligations.
While taxes geared towards public safety are often looked upon favorably (though they don't always pass, depending on the how "taxable" voters are feeling at the time), this proposition has become a political football.
The proposition has found itself in the middle of several issues. Mayor Slay argues it will put more police and firemen in the stations. They more quietly acknowledge it will help relieve some of the pension pressure following a failed lawsuit the city filed to relieve itself of some of the pension obligation.
The group working to recall the mayor want to vote it down to protest the Mayor's actions in regards to former Fire Chief Sherman George. Others oppose it on strictly economic justice issues. Yet still more say it is merely a bandaid for gaps the city government's open-handed attitude toward tax subsidies has created.
Did you vote for or against the proposal? And have any of the arguments, for or against, swayed your mind?